Read Trump’s ban recommendations from Facebook’s review panel | Social Media News

The board upheld Donald Trump’s suspension from the platform, but criticized the company’s actions.

A semi-independent review panel has upheld US President Donald Trump’s suspension from Facebook for inciting violence following the 2020 election, while criticizing the social media giant’s handling of the situation.

The board was launched last October amid an ongoing debate over the company’s ability to handle hate speech and misinformation on the platform, which critics say has played a role. role in violence, human rights violations and even genocide around the world. Facebook has approximately 1.7 billion users worldwide.

Wednesday’s decision, which gives Facebook six months to review Trump’s suspension, also calls on the company to “clear up widespread confusion about how decisions about influential users are made.”

Here are the other recommendations made in the decision:

  • “Quickly transfer content containing political speech from highly influential users to specialized personnel who know the linguistic and political context. These personnel must be free from political and economic interference, as well as from any undue influence.
  • Dedicate adequate resources and expertise to assess the risk of harm from globally influential accounts.
  • Produce more information to help users understand and evaluate the process and criteria for applying Media Interest Allowance, including how it applies to influential accounts. The company should also clearly explain the rationale, standards and processes for cross-checking, and report the relative error rates of cross-checked determinations compared to ordinary enforcement procedures.
  • Undertake a comprehensive review of Facebook’s potential contribution to the narrative of voter fraud and heightened tensions that culminated in violence in the United States on January 6. This should be an open reflection on the design and policy choices Facebook has made that could allow its platform to be abused.
  • Clearly state in its corporate human rights policy how it collects, maintains and, where appropriate, shares information to facilitate the investigation and possible prosecution of serious violations of international criminal law, human rights of human and humanitarian law.
  • Explain its warning and penalty process for restricting profiles, pages, groups, and accounts in Facebook’s Community Standards and Instagram’s Community Guidelines.
  • Include the number of profile, page and account restrictions in its transparency reports, with information broken down by region and country.
  • Provide users with accessible information on the number of violations, strikes and penalties they have received, as well as the consequences that will follow from future violations.
  • Develop and publish a policy that governs Facebook’s response to crises or emerging situations where its regular processes would not prevent or avert imminent harm. These guidelines should define appropriate parameters for such actions, including the obligation to review one’s decision within a specified period.